By Michael J. Gergen, Marc T. Campopiano and Andrew H. Meyer

On September 5, 2014, San Diego Gas & Electric (“SDG&E”) issued a 2014 Energy Storage System (“ESS”) Request for Offers (“RFO”) soliciting at least 25 MW—and up to 800 MW—of energy storage (the “2014 ES RFO”).  SDG&E’s 2014 ES RFO is among the largest solicitations to date in the U.S. for grid-scale energy storage resources.

By Michael J. Gergen, Marc T. Campopiano, and Andrew H. Meyer

On August 14, 2014, the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) issued an Order Instituting Rulemaking (“Order”) to establish policies, procedures, and rules to guide California investor-owned electric utilities (“IOUs”) in developing their Distribution Resources Plan Proposals (“DRPs”) in accordance with the requirements of Public Utilities Code Section 769.  In particular, the rulemaking will evaluate the IOUs’ existing and future electric distribution infrastructure and planning procedures with respect to incorporating Distributed Energy Resources (“DERs”) into the planning and operation of their electric distribution systems.  DERs include distributed renewable generation resources, energy efficiency, energy storage, electric vehicles, and demand response technologies. 

By Michael J. Gergen and Andrew H. Meyer

On August 1, 2014, the California Independent System Operator (“CAISO”) filed proposed tariff changes at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) in FERC Docket No. ER14-2574 that would establish new flexible resource adequacy capacity (“FRAC”) and must-offer obligation (“MOO”) requirements aimed at ensuring that adequate flexible capacity is available to address the added variability and net load volatility associated with ongoing and expected future changes on the CAISO-controlled grid. In its filing, the CAISO proposes a November 1, 2014, effective date for the tariff changes establishing the FRAC-MOO so that they will apply to resource adequacy showings beginning in January 2015.  FERC has set Friday, August 22, 2014, as the due date for comments on the CAISO’s FRAC-MOO proposal.        

By Michael J. Gergen, Eli Hopson, and Andrew H. Meyer

The California Independent System Operator (“CAISO”) is moving forward with a stakeholder initiative to examine issues with connecting energy storage facilities to the CAISO controlled grid under the CAISO’s existing interconnection rules, and to develop new policies as needed to clarify and facilitate interconnection of energy storage. 

By Michael J. Gergen, Jared W. Johnson, and Andrew H. Meyer

The California Independent System Operator (“CAISO”) has taken a significant step toward proposing a new ancillary service known as the “Flexible Ramping Product” as part of its market design.  With increasing levels of variable energy resources on the CAISO-controlled grid, maintaining power balance requires increased ramping capability, as the variable outputs of the renewable resources may increase the magnitude of 5-minute to 5-minute net load changes.  In a Straw Proposal issued June 2, 2014, the CAISO proposes to use the Flexible Ramping Product to address these emerging operational challenges relating to maintaining power balance in real-time dispatch.  In doing so, the CAISO emphasized that while its existing regulation service product could be called upon to address forecast uncertainties, procuring more regulation service is problematic from an economic and market efficiency perspective both because the generating capacity of some resources must be reserved to provide regulation service and because more real-time dispatch prices will be compensated at administratively-set penalty rates.  The CAISO stated that its Flexible Ramping Product is designed to deal with uncertainties that are realized before the binding real-time dispatch using a market-based design to procure ramping capacity in the CAISO’s day-ahead market, fifteen-minute market and real-time dispatch.

By Michael J. Gergen and Jared W. Johnson

On November 15, 2012, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) issued a Policy Statement to provide new guidance for applicants seeking rate incentives for new transmission infrastructure projects.  FERC’s transmission rate incentives policy stems from a package of amendments to the Federal Power Act (“FPA”) enacted by Congress in 2005, specifically Section 219 of the FPA, which was added to provide incentive-based rate treatments for investments in transmission infrastructure that would

By Daniel Scripps

A new report (pdf) from the Brookings Institution discusses the nearly two dozen  state-level clean energy funds (CEFs) that have invested in clean energy projects and concludes that CEFs hold out great promise for the continued design and implementation of “bottom up,” decentralized clean energy finance solutions and economic development.  The report also anticipates that CEFs will need to play a critical role given the decline in federal financing support for clean energy.

The report

By Janice Schneider and Stacey VanBelleghem

The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) has proposed significant reforms to its current regulations for non-agricultural surface leases on Indian land.  76 Fed. Reg. 73784 (Nov. 29, 2011).  The proposed regulations include new provisions expressly governing Wind Energy Evaluation Leases (WELs) and Wind and Solar Resource (WSR) Leases and would streamline the leasing approval process while allowing additional flexibility that is lacking under the current regulatory framework.  The leasing reforms are consistent with

By Janice Schneider and Joshua Marnitz

Last week, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) published in the Federal Register an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking outlining a competitive process for leasing public lands for solar and wind energy development.  76 Fed. Reg. 81906 (December 29, 2011).  BLM believes that a competitive process will better enable it to capture fair market value for the use of public lands, as required under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) (43 U.S.C.

By Michael Feeley and Aron Potash

A lawsuit which delayed and once threatened to dismantle California’s greenhouse gas (GHG) cap and trade scheme was largely resolved last week, removing one roadblock to California’s plan to be the first state to impose an economy-wide GHG trading program.  Under modified regulations adopted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) on October 20, 2011, California will require certain emitters of GHGs to obtain allowances or offsets in amounts commensurate to their respective emissions