Skip to content

Menu

Environment, Land & Resources

Insights and commentary on environmental issues and developments impacting business across the world

HomeAbout UsTopicsSubscribe
Latham & Watkins logo
HomeAbout UsTopics
Subscribe
Search
Close

Environment, Land & Resources

Insights and commentary on environmental issues and developments impacting business across the world

Home » Posts » Human Rights Considerations Proposed for Inclusion in UK Trade Bill

Human Rights Considerations Proposed for Inclusion in UK Trade Bill

Posted on December 16, 2020
Posted in Environmental, Social, and Governance

The House of Lords has adopted two amendments to require assessment of compliance with international agreements and human rights.

By Paul A. Davies and Michael D. Green

On 7 December 2020, the UK House of Lords voted on and passed four amendments to the Trade Bill (the Bill), including two amendments referring to human rights obligations. These amendments propose requiring a mandatory assessment of human rights performance in future trade agreements, as well as an obligation on the UK to revoke trade agreements with countries found to have committed genocide.

Background

The Bill was first introduced in Parliament in March 2020, with a view to implementing international trade agreements following the end of the Brexit transition period. The Bill also includes provisions establishing the Trade Remedies Authority, an institution intended to administer the new trade framework. The current human rights amendments were introduced during the report stage of the legislative process in the House of Lords.

The current bill aims to ensure that the UK continues to champion human rights globally and does not apply special rules to certain countries based on financial considerations.

The First Amendment

The first amendment would oblige the government to “conduct a risk assessment which considers whether the agreement would comply with the United Kingdom’s international treaties and other obligations, with particular reference to human rights”, and examine serious human rights violations. The amendment’s text subsequently defines serious violations as violations of an individual’s human rights and fundamental freedoms, including life, freedom from torture or cruel or inhumane treatment, and freedom from slavery.

The amendment would require that the aforementioned risk assessment be presented to the relevant Committees in both Houses of Parliament. The government would also need to present an annual report on the continuing compliance of trade agreements with the UK’s international obligations.

The Second Amendment

The second amendment would revoke any international bilateral trade agreement concluded with states that are later found to have committed genocide. The High Court of England is conferred the powers to determine whether a country is found guilty of having committed genocide under Article II of the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

Next Steps

Following the report stage, the Bill will be reprinted to include all the agreed amendments. The Bill will then undergo a third reading in the House of Lords, during which the Lords will have a further opportunity to amend the draft legislation, before being returned to the House of Commons. The first House can either reject, revise, or suggest alternatives to the amendments. Until this process is completed, the final text under which the Bill will be promulgated remains to be seen.

Latham & Watkins will continue to monitor developments in this area.

This post was written with the assistance of Sabina Aionesei in the London office of Latham & Watkins.

Tags: Brexit, European Convention on Human Rights, human rights, Supply Chain, Trade Bill, UK government, United Nations
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
Sustainble green building. Eco-friendly building in modern city. ESG. Sustainable glass office building with green tree. Office with green environment. Corporate sustainability. Net zero emission.
Understanding New York’s Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: Key Insights and Comparative Analysis
May 5, 2025
GettyImages-1468396766_50034
New German Government Takes Office: Key Developments in ESG and Supply Chain Laws
April 22, 2025
GettyImages-498489893_50034
China Expands Its National Carbon Emission Trading Scheme to More Industries
April 17, 2025
Subscribe to the Environment, Land & Resources Blog
Subscribe
Latham & Watkins logo
Facebook Twitter RSS LinkedIn

Austin, Beijing, Boston, Brussels, Century City, Chicago, Dubai, Düsseldorf, Frankfort, Hamburg, Hong Kong, Houston, London, Los Angeles, Madrid, Milan, Munich, New York, Orange County, Paris, Riyadh, San Diego, San Francisco, Seoul, Silicon Valley, Singapore, Tel Aviv, Tokyo, Washington, D.C.

Portions of this blog may constitute attorney advertising. Any testimonial or endorsement on this profile does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each representation.

Latham & Watkins operates worldwide as a limited liability partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (USA) with affiliated limited liability partnerships conducting the practice in France, Hong Kong, Italy, Singapore, and the United Kingdom and as an affiliated partnership conducting the practice in Japan. Latham & Watkins operates in Israel through a limited liability company, in South Korea as a Foreign Legal Consultant Office, and in Saudi Arabia through a limited liability company.

Topics

Archives

© 2025, Latham & Watkins
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo